Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Point of Technique
2 (
1
); 36-38
doi:
10.1055/s-0038-1676151

Transesophageal Echocardiography for Ross-Konno Procedure

Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology, CTC, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of CTVS, CTC, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Shivani Aggarwal, Senior Resident Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology, CTC, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences New Delhi 110029 India drshivani.del@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Ross procedure involves replacing diseased aortic valve with pulmonary autograft and placing a pulmonary/aortic homograft between the right ventricle and pulmonary artery. In case of small aortic annulus in pediatric patients or in patients with multilevel left ventricular outflow obstruction, aortic annulus enlargement might be required concurrently. Konno type of aortic ventriculoplasty is most commonly done. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) has classified transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as class I indication for congenital heart disease

Keywords

mild tricuspid regurgitation
mitral regurgitation
moderate mitral stenosis
Ross-Konno procedure
Ross procedure
subvalvular disease
transesophageal echocardiography

Introduction

Ross procedure involves replacing the diseased aortic valve with pulmonary autograft and coronary buttons and placing a pulmonary/aortic homograft between the right ventricle and pulmonary artery. In children with small aortic annulus or patients with multilevel left ventricular outflow obstruction, usually Konno type of aortic ventriculoplasty is added for aortic annular enlargement. In children and young adults, Ross-Konno procedure provides better hemodynamic profile, decreased need for anticoagulation, life expectancy similar to healthy age matched controls, and improved quality of life in the postoperative period. Concerns regarding complexity of procedure, the neo-aortic root dilatation disproportionate to somatic growth over time, progressive calcification, issues regarding durability of pulmonary valve (a valve from low pressure circulation implanted in a high-pressure circulation), and pulmonary homograft failure have limited the use of this procedure. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that the living pulmonary valve provides better hemodynamic profile than bioprosthetic or mechanical valves.

Case: An 8-year-old boy with history of progressively increasing breathlessness on exertion (New York Heart Association [NYHA] II to III) was diagnosed with severe mitral regurgitation (MR), moderate mitral stenosis (MS) with subvalvular disease (SVD), and mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). There was mild aortic stenosis (AS) with severe aortic regurgitation (AR). The pulmonary valve was of normal morphology with annular diameter of 13 mm whereas the aortic annular diameter was 9 mm. On the basis of TTE, Ross-Konno procedure with mitral valve repair/replacement was planned. Intraoperative precardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed severe MS (Fig. 1) and severe AR (Fig. 2a) with aortic annulus of 9 mm (Fig. 2b). The pulmonary valve was of normal morphology, but the annular diameter was measured as 19 mm (Fig. 3). On basis of TEE findings that were further confirmed by huge disparity in sizes of aorta and pulmonary artery on visual inspection, the Ross-Konno procedure was abandoned. Repair of aortic valve was attempted by decalcification and commissurotomy whereas calcified anterior mitral leaflet and SVD mandated replacement of mitral valve. Following weaning from CPB, TEE revealed successful repair of aortic valve with mild AR with peak systolic gradient 29 mm Hg and mean systolic gradient 14 mm Hg (Fig. 4a, 4b).

(a) Midesophageal four-chamber view with color-flow Doppler showing color flow across mitral valve (yellow arrow) suggesting presence of mitral stenosis. The anterior and posterior mitral leaflets are thickened and heavily calcified. (b) Spectral Doppler across mitral valve (MV) in midesophageal aortic long-axis view showing gradients across MV. The peak diastolic gradient is 12 mm Hg suggesting severe mitral stenosis. LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle.
Fig. 1
(a) Midesophageal four-chamber view with color-flow Doppler showing color flow across mitral valve (yellow arrow) suggesting presence of mitral stenosis. The anterior and posterior mitral leaflets are thickened and heavily calcified. (b) Spectral Doppler across mitral valve (MV) in midesophageal aortic long-axis view showing gradients across MV. The peak diastolic gradient is 12 mm Hg suggesting severe mitral stenosis. LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle.
(a) Midesophageal aortic long-axis view showing dimensions of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) 11.3 mm, aortic annulus (Ao) 9 mm and ascending aorta 11.7 mm. (b) Spectral Doppler across aortic valve in deep transgastric view showing gradient across aortic valve. The mean systolic gradient is 7 mm Hg. There is severe aortic regurgitation as suggested by dense envelope in diastole.
Fig. 2
(a) Midesophageal aortic long-axis view showing dimensions of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) 11.3 mm, aortic annulus (Ao) 9 mm and ascending aorta 11.7 mm. (b) Spectral Doppler across aortic valve in deep transgastric view showing gradient across aortic valve. The mean systolic gradient is 7 mm Hg. There is severe aortic regurgitation as suggested by dense envelope in diastole.
Midesophageal modified RV inflow outflow view with color-flow Doppler showing pulmonary artery dimensions 19 mm.
Fig. 3
Midesophageal modified RV inflow outflow view with color-flow Doppler showing pulmonary artery dimensions 19 mm.
(a) Midesophageal aortic valve long axis view with color flow Doppler showing mild AR in postoperative period following aortic valve repair. (b) Spectral Doppler across aortic valve in deep TG view in postoperative period following aortic valve repair. The peak systolic gradient is 29 mm Hg and mean systolic gradient is 13 mm Hg.
Fig. 4
(a) Midesophageal aortic valve long axis view with color flow Doppler showing mild AR in postoperative period following aortic valve repair. (b) Spectral Doppler across aortic valve in deep TG view in postoperative period following aortic valve repair. The peak systolic gradient is 29 mm Hg and mean systolic gradient is 13 mm Hg.

Discussion

Transesophageal echocardiography is emerging as an indispensable tool for deciding intraoperative management of complex congenital cardiac lesions. The use of intraoperative TEE may change the entire plan of surgical management as happened in this case. The basic prerequisite for Ross procedure is that the pulmonary annulus should be at most within 5 mm of aortic annulus and should have normal morphology. The TEE in this case although revealed a normal morphologic pulmonary valve, there was huge disparity in the annuli of aorta and pulmonary artery, which changed the entire surgical plan. The Ross-Konno procedure had to be abandoned, and decision to repair the aortic valve was taken. In the post-CPB period, the aortic valve assessment revealed mild AR that was accepted because the child was only 8 years old.

Transesophageal echocardiography is recommended as a class I indication for congenital heart disease1 by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) affecting intraoperative management2 as well as postoperative prognosis. Stevenson et al have demonstrated that among congenital disorders, Ross procedure requires most evaluation with intraoperative TEE.3 TEE is required in pre-CPB period to confirm the diagnosis; identify the mechanism of aortic pathology; assess morphology of the pulmonary valve and presence of pulmonary hypertension; and measure aortic and pulmonary annulus (± 3 mm), any sub- or supra-aortic left ventricular outflow obstruction, and right ventricular outflow obstruction. In addition, TEE helps in assessment of volume status, ventricular function, and cardiac output that is helpful in intraoperative management. In the post-CPB period, TEE examination should be aimed at assessment of any anatomic/functional derangement of autograft and allograft (leaflet coaptation /prolapsed /restriction), transvalvular gradient across both autograft and allograft, any regional wall motion abnormality in region of the left main coronary artery or left anterior descending artery or septal perforators, and presence of any new aortic insufficiency. Neo-aortic insufficiency following Ross-Konno procedure predicts increased likelihood of progression to hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation on long-term follow-up requiring reoperation.

Thus, TEE is becoming an important tool in the armamentarium of cardiac anesthesiologist for guiding intraoperative management, especially in complex congenital heart disease. TEE helps in evaluating suitability of valve for repair, and especially in delineating any residual lesion amenable to repair after the surgical procedure. It results in improved patient prognosis and reduced morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. , , , et al . ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(5):954-970.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al . The significance of transesophageal echocardiography in assessing congenital heart disease: our experience. Congenit Heart Dis. 2014;9(4):300-306.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Transesophageal echocardiography during repair of congenital cardiac defects: identification of residual problems necessitating reoperation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1993;6(4):356-365.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
381

PDF downloads
222
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections