Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Letter to Editor
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JCCC_63_2025

Ultrasound-guided Surgical Retrieval of Broken Arterial Catheter

Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

*Corresponding author: Ajmer Singh, Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India. ajmersingh@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Mukati R, Singh A, Rasamalla G, Mehta Y. Ultrasound-guided Surgical Retrieval of Broken Arterial Catheter. J Card Crit Care TSS. doi: 10.25259/JCCC_63_2025

Dear Editor,

Cannulation of the radial artery for continuous monitoring of blood pressure and frequent blood gas analysis is generally preferred due to its easy accessibility, predictable anatomy, and low complication rates, supported by collateral circulation, which helps minimize ischemic risk. However, arterial cannulation can unexpectedly lead to serious complications such as bleeding, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, thrombosis, infection, tissue ischemia, and nerve injury.[1] We present an uncommon complication of a radial arterial catheter during its attempted removal.

A 58-year-old man with coronary artery disease was scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Under local anesthesia, right radial artery cannulation was performed (20-G arterial cannula, BD FloswitchTM, Becton Dickinson, Ireland) in the first attempt, using the digital palpation method. The cannula was secured with a sterile, transparent TegadermTM dressing. The arterial catheter was connected to the continuous saline-flush system. On the 2nd post-operative day, during the attempted removal of the arterial catheter, an accidental fracture of the catheter was noted. The removed arterial catheter had a length of only about 5 mm attached to its hub, and the remaining part of the catheter was suspected to be lost in the artery. Urgent vascular consultation was sought. On ultrasound evaluation (12L-RS Linear Vascular Probe, GE Medical Systems, Jiangsu, China), the broken arterial catheter was located in the radial artery [Figure 1]. Under sterile conditions, using local anesthesia and ultrasound guidance, the proximal and distal controls of the radial artery were taken, an arteriotomy was performed, and the catheter was surgically retrieved [Figure 2]. A 2-French embolectomy catheter was inserted, good forward and backward blood flows were ensured, and the arteriotomy site was closed. The patient made an uneventful recovery without vascular compromise.

Ultrasound images showing retained catheter (arrows) in the radial artery, (a): Long-axis view, (b): Short-axis view.
Figure 1:
Ultrasound images showing retained catheter (arrows) in the radial artery, (a): Long-axis view, (b): Short-axis view.
Arterial cannula with broken hub and retrieved part of the catheter.
Figure 2:
Arterial cannula with broken hub and retrieved part of the catheter.

Loss of a catheter to a vessel is a rare complication of arterial cannulation and has only been reported in sporadic case reports.[2-4] The exact mechanism leading to catheter fracture is not fully understood. The possible reasons described in the literature include a malfunction during device design, prolonged cannulation time, catheter shearing by needle during cannulation, kinking during securement, damage by the needle while sewing the catheter to the skin, cutting the securing suture by the scissors, anatomical variation (tortuous or small vessel), a combination of these factors, or unknown etiology.[5] The risks of vascular complications arising from percutaneous radial artery cannulation, including arterial occlusion, cannula dysfunction, and thrombus formation, increase markedly after 3 days. Repeated movements of the wrist during recovery from anesthesia are also postulated to cause shearing and fracture of the arterial catheter.[3] Seldinger technique, as compared to the modified Seldinger technique, is a faster and more predictable radial artery access technique, with no increase in bleeding or radial artery occlusion. For the radial artery cannulation, both the guidewire-based and ultrasound-guided methods are superior to the direct palpation method, and significantly improve the success rate in the first attempt. However, they do not significantly increase the overall success rate or reduce the risk of complications. With regard to the type of arterial catheter, the polyurethane catheter is favored for its balance of stiffness and flexibility, reducing kinking and spasm compared to Teflon material. The reason for the broken catheter in this case was unknown.

It is important to find out the precise location of the retained arterial catheter. Local vascular spasm can prevent further embolization of the broken catheter. Some of the previous authors have performed surgical exploration without any imaging proof.[3] Others have used an X-ray of the wrist to localize the arterial catheter, which does not give a clear picture. A three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography has been used to identify a foreign body in the radial artery.[2] Real-time ultrasound imaging allows rapid localization of the intraluminal arterial foreign body. The use of ultrasound is preferred over radiograph or computed tomography because it is real-time, inexpensive, and does not expose the patient to radiation. The potential benefits of the use of ultrasound include (i) confirmation of intra-arterial location of the catheter, (ii) confirmation of distal migration into the palmar arteries, (iii) identification of proximal and distal ends of the catheter, (iv) precise cutaneous incision, (v) exact location of the arteriotomy site, and (vi) minimized surgical time.[6]

An intra-arterial fragment can either be retrieved by an endovascular technique or surgical method. Distal migration can make direct surgical incision difficult to perform. If the fragment migrates more distally toward the deep palmar arch, the possibility of ischemic complications could increase. Distal thrombosis and embolization resulting in digital ischemia and subsequent infection can also occur if the surgical exploration is delayed.[7] In conclusion, it is emphasized that the integrity of every medical object is checked after its removal from a patient.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflict of interest:

Dr. Yatin Mehta is on the Editorial Board of the Journal.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . The possible mechanism of arterial catheter fracture: A case report. J Clin Anesth. 2021;73:110336.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . An iatrogenic complication of radial artery cannulation. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2010;48:145-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Unusual complication of radial artery cannulation and its management: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:955-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Accidental transection of radial [correction of radical] artery cannula. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:142-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Retained arterial catheter following patient self-discontinuation-a case report. J Surg Case Reports. 2024;2024:rjad727.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Ultrasound guided location and removal of retained arterial cannula fragment. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:338-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Foreign body arterial embolus to the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17:484-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
256

PDF downloads
282
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections