Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
10 (
2
); 122-126
doi:
10.25259/JCCC_84_2025

The Intelligent Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Artificial Intelligence and the Critical Care Management of Post-operative Cardiac Surgery Complications

Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

*Corresponding author: Khaled Ebrahim Al Ebrahim, Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. dr.k.ebrahim@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Al Ebrahim KE. The Intelligent Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Artificial Intelligence and the Critical Care Management of Post-operative Cardiac Surgery Complications. J Card Crit Care TSS. 2026;10:122-6. doi: 10.25259/JCCC_84_2025

Abstract

Background:

Major post-operative complications remain a principal determinant of morbidity, mortality, and intensive care utilization after cardiac surgery despite advances in operative techniques and perioperative care. Early recognition, protocolized management, and multidisciplinary critical care are essential to improving outcomes. Emerging digital technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), are beginning to reshape monitoring, risk prediction, and clinical decision-making within the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU).

Objective:

The objective of the study is to review contemporary advances in the prevention, early detection, and management of major post-operative cardiac surgery complications and to highlight the emerging role of AI-supported decision systems and their implications for resident training.

Methods:

A targeted narrative review of recent clinical trials, meta-analyses, and international guidelines published between 2020 and 2025 was conducted. The review focused on major post-operative complications including atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding and transfusion-related syndromes, respiratory failure, neurologic complications, infection, and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). Evidence was synthesized to emphasize ICU-applicable management strategies and the growing integration of AI-assisted monitoring and predictive analytics.

Results:

Post-operative atrial fibrillation remains the most common rhythm disturbance, with prevention centered on perioperative beta-blockade, electrolyte optimization, and selective amiodarone prophylaxis. AKI affects up to one-third of patients; KDIGO-based care bundles, biomarker-guided detection, and hemodynamic optimization improve early recognition and outcomes. Contemporary patient blood management strategies, including viscoelastic-guided transfusion and antifibrinolytic therapy, reduce bleeding and re-exploration. Respiratory complications are mitigated through lung-protective ventilation, fast-track extubation protocols, and early mobilization. Neurologic complications and infections require systematic screening, prevention bundles, and prompt multidisciplinary intervention. LCOS remains a critical post-operative challenge requiring early hemodynamic optimization and timely escalation to mechanical circulatory support. Increasingly, AI-driven predictive models are being explored to support early complication detection, risk stratification, and real-time clinical decision support in the cardiac ICU.

Conclusion:

Post-operative complications continue to shape outcomes after cardiac surgery. Contemporary management relies on standardized care bundles, early detection strategies, and coordinated multidisciplinary ICU care. The integration of AI-enabled monitoring and predictive analytics may further enhance early recognition of deterioration, optimize resource utilization, and provide a valuable educational framework for training the next generation of cardiac surgery residents.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence
Cardiac surgery
Clinical management
Postoperative complications
Risk prediction

INTRODUCTION

Despite major advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, post-operative complications remain a key determinant of outcomes after cardiac surgery. Conditions such as post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF), acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, respiratory failure, neurologic events, infection, and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) continue to contribute to significant morbidity, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality. Early recognition and structured management in the cardiac ICU are essential for improving outcomes. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies may assist clinicians by integrating large volumes of physiologic data to support early detection of complications and clinical decision-making. This review summarizes contemporary strategies for managing major post-operative cardiac surgery complications and highlights the evolving role of AI in critical care and surgical training.[1-4]

POAF

Prevention, risk stratification, and targeted prophylaxis are central. Beta-blockers should be continued perioperatively unless contraindicated. Statins and optimal magnesium levels may reduce the incidence. Prophylactic amiodarone can be considered for high-risk patients; the timing, dose, and monitoring should follow institutional protocols. Current guideline-based recommendations emphasize continuation of beta-blockers and selective pharmacologic prophylaxis in high-risk patients.[1,2]

Management

Initial management focuses on hemodynamic stability and thromboembolic risk assessment. Rate control with beta-blockers or short-acting calcium-channel blockers is first line in stable patients; rhythm control with amiodarone or cardioversion is appropriate for persistent symptoms or instability. Ivabradine has emerged as a potential adjunct for heart rate control in selected patients, although evidence remains evolving, and it should not replace first-line therapies. Anticoagulation decisions balance stroke risk with bleeding risk; when POAF persists beyond 48 h, therapeutic anticoagulation is usually indicated after assessing the surgical context. Left atrial appendage occlusion during surgery is increasingly recommended in selected patients to reduce long-term thromboembolic risk.[1,2]

AKI

Prevention and early detection perioperative strategies focus on optimization of renal perfusion, avoidance of nephrotoxins, and judicious fluid management. Hemodynamic targets generally aim to maintain a mean arterial pressure sufficient to ensure renal perfusion while avoiding excessive vasoconstriction. Minimization of high-dose catecholamine exposure is recommended; vasopressin has demonstrated favorable effects on renal perfusion in selected patients. Implementation of KDIGO-based care bundles for high-risk patients reduces AKI incidence. Predictive biomarkers including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and kidney injury molecule-1 facilitate early detection and risk stratification.[3-6]

Management

Management is primarily supportive: Hemodynamic optimization, correction of contributing factors (obstruction, hemolysis, and sepsis), and avoidance of further nephrotoxins. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is reserved for conventional indications (refractory hyperkalemia, acidosis, volume overload, and uremic complications), with modality (Continuous RRT vs. intermittent) tailored to hemodynamic stability and institutional experience. Albumin and balanced crystalloids are preferred in many settings; diuretics may assist in volume management but do not prevent AKI progression. Close nephrology collaboration is recommended for severe or persistent AKI.[3-6]

BLEEDING AND TRANSFUSION-RELATED COMPLICATIONS

Prevention: Adopt a multimodal patient blood management (PBM) approach aligned with contemporary international societies’ guidelines. Routine use of antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid is recommended unless contraindicated.[7-9]

Management

Recent evidence, including findings from the FARES-II study, supports guideline-directed dosing of antifibrinolytics and reinforces the role of targeted coagulation therapy. Fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrates play an increasing role in viscoelastic-guided hemostatic management, allowing rapid correction of coagulopathy while minimizing allogeneic transfusion.

When bleeding occurs, a structured diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm is essential: Early re-exploration for surgical sources, correction of coagulopathy guided by coagulation tests (prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, platelet count, and viscoelastic testing), targeted use of blood components (platelets, fibrinogen concentrate, or cryoprecipitate), and reversal of anticoagulation when needed. Restrictive transfusion strategies (e.g., hemoglobin threshold ~7–8 g/dL) are commonly applied in stable patients, while more liberal targets may be used in the hemodynamically unstable or ongoing bleeding.[7-10]

RESPIRATORY COMPLICATIONS AND PROLONGED VENTILATION

Respiratory failure and prolonged mechanical ventilation are influenced by pre-operative lung disease, prolonged bypass, transfusion, and fluid overload. This increases ICU length of stay with all its sequelae, including infection and generalized sepsis risk, leading, if untreated, to multiorgan failure and death. Phrenic nerve palsy or paralysis should always be ruled out in these cases.[11,12]

Prevention and early management

Lung-protective ventilation strategies, early extubation protocols (fast-track pathways), optimized pain control (multimodal analgesia and regional blocks), aggressive pulmonary hygiene, and early mobilization reduce the duration of ventilation. Non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal oxygen can prevent reintubation in selected patients.[11-13]

Treatment of established respiratory failure

Treat underlying causes (atelectasis, pulmonary edema, aspiration, and pneumonia). For severe hypoxemia, apply Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) management principles – lung-protective ventilation, conservative fluid strategy, use of high-flow nasal oxygen, or noninvasive ventilation to prevent reintubation. In severe or refractory hypoxemia, early application of ARDS-based strategies – including prone positioning and timely escalation to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in experienced centers – has been associated with improved survival and reduced ventilator-associated injury.[12]

NEUROLOGIC COMPLICATIONS: STROKE

Perioperative stroke, though less frequent than other complications, carries devastating consequences. Pre-operative assessment should include systematic evaluation for left atrial and left ventricular thrombi, with appropriate management before surgery to minimize the risk of postoperative stroke. Risk mitigation includes careful aortic manipulation, optimized blood pressure control, and cerebral monitoring when indicated. Early neurology consultation and imaging guide reperfusion or supportive strategies. Acute ischemic stroke therapies must be considered within the context of recent surgery and bleeding risk.[14-16]

Delirium

Delirium affects a substantial proportion of cardiac surgery patients (reported ranges vary widely) and is associated with longer stays, cognitive decline, and increased mortality. Systematic screening (Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU), multi-component prevention bundles (sleep promotion, early mobilization, orientation, and minimization of deliriogenic medications), and prompt management improve outcomes. Treat identifiable precipitants (pain, hypoxia, infection, and metabolic disturbance); antipsychotics are reserved for severe agitation threatening safety and used cautiously.[1,14-16]

INFECTION AND SEPSIS

Surgical site infections, mediastinitis, and bloodstream infections carry high morbidity. Risk factors include prolonged operative time, re-exploration, obesity, diabetes, and transfusion.[17]

Prevention

Adherence to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, glycemic control, temperature management, and sterile technique reduces infection risk. Early removal of invasive devices (catheters, lines) and antimicrobial stewardship are important.[17,18]

Management

Prompt source control (including reoperation for mediastinitis when necessary), tailored antimicrobial therapy guided by cultures, and sepsis bundle implementation (timely fluids, vasopressors, and source control) are essential. Hyperglycemia control, nutritional support, and rehabilitation aid recovery.[17-19]

LCOS RECOGNITION AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

LCOS ranges from mild low output to frank cardiogenic shock and arises from myocardial ischemia, inadequate myocardial protection, arrhythmia, or ventricular dysfunction.[20]

Management strategies

Early hemodynamic optimization with inotropes and vasopressors, correction of reversible causes (tamponade, hypovolemia, and ischemia), mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, ECMO) for refractory cases, and timely reoperation for surgical causes are cornerstones. Multidisciplinary decision-making with cardiac surgery, intensivists, and heart failure teams improves timing and outcomes.[20-22]

Discussion and practical recommendations

A multidisciplinary, protocol-driven approach tailored to institutional resources improves outcomes after cardiac surgery. Key principles include pre-operative risk optimization (anemia, glycemic control, and smoking cessation), intraoperative strategies to reduce embolic and bleeding risk (meticulous technique and antifibrinolytics), and post-operative algorithms for early detection (standardized monitoring and biomarker use) and stepwise management of complications. Implementation of condition-specific care bundles (e.g., KDIGO AKI bundle, delirium prevention bundles, and PBM programs) has demonstrable benefit in reducing complication rates.[4-11]

THE ROLE OF AI IN CRITICAL CARE MANAGEMENT FOR POST-OPERATIVE CARDIAC SURGERY

AI is increasingly emerging as a supportive tool in the management of critically ill patients following cardiac surgery. In the post-operative ICU, AI-driven systems can integrate large volumes of physiologic, laboratory, and hemodynamic data in real time to assist clinicians in early detection of complications such as LCOS, arrhythmias, AKI, sepsis, and respiratory failure. Machine-learning algorithms have demonstrated potential in predicting hemodynamic instability, guiding ventilator adjustments, optimizing fluid and vasopressor therapy, and identifying patients at risk for prolonged ICU stay or readmission. In addition, AI-based predictive models may enhance decision-making by stratifying risk, personalizing post-operative management, and supporting early intervention before clinical deterioration becomes evident. While these technologies do not replace clinical judgment, they offer a complementary layer of data-driven insight that may improve monitoring precision, resource utilization, and ultimately post-operative outcomes in cardiac surgical patients.[23-26]

CONCLUSION

Post-operative complications remain a major determinant of outcomes after cardiac surgery. Contemporary management relies on early detection, evidence-based care bundles, and coordinated multidisciplinary ICU care. Emerging AI tools offer the potential to enhance early recognition of deterioration, support data-driven decision-making, optimize resource use, and provide a valuable framework for resident training. Integrating AI into cardiac critical care represents a promising step toward safer, more personalized post-operative management and the education of future cardiac surgeons.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that they have used artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology solely for language refinement and to improve the clarity of writing. No AI assistance was employed in the generation of scientific content, data analysis or interpretation.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , . The predictive value of machine learning for postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2026;28:e72304.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery: Clinical practice review. J Thorac Dis. 2024;16:1503-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Prophylactic left atrial appendage ligation during coronary artery bypass graft surgery allows safe avoidance of anticoagulation regardless of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Cureus. 2024;16:e59876.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: Prediction, prevention, and management. Anesthesiology. 2023;139:880-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) in adults and pediatrics; Prevention is the optimal management. Heart Surg Forum. 2022;25:E504-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury. Kidney360. 2024;5:909-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025;40:ivae170.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Re-exploration for bleeding after cardiac surgery: Revaluation of urgency and factors promoting low rate. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16:166.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Cardiac surgical bleeding, transfusion, and quality metrics: Joint consensus statement by the enhanced recovery after surgery cardiac society and society for the advancement of patient blood management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2025;119:280-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Cardiac surgery morbidity and mortality in hypertensive and arrhythmic patients: A retrospective analysis. Cureus. 2023;15:e48505.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Postoperative pneumonia following open heart surgery. Cureus. 2020;12:e10320.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and posterior probability of mortality benefit in a post hoc Bayesian analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:2251-9. Erratum in: JAMA 2019;321:2245
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Diaphragmatic palsy after cardiac surgery in adult and pediatric patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2019;27:481-5. Erratum in: Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2019;27:616
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Systematic literature review on early detection of postoperative delirium in adult patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19:678.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Stroke after heart valve surgery: A single center institution report. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19:518.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Acute ischemic and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular strokes after cardiac surgery: Incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Crit Care Res Pract. 2025;2025:6645363.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Sternal wound infection following open heart surgery: Incidence, risk factor, pathogen, and mortality. Heart Surg Forum. 2023;26:E134-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Sternal wound complications: Objective reclassification and surgical reconsideration. Heart Surg Forum. 2020;23:E076-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Prevention, classification and management review of deep sternal wound infection. Heart Surg Forum. 2020;23:E652-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Low cardiac output syndrome after adult cardiac surgery: Predictive value of peak systolic global longitudinal strain. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1476-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Prediction of low cardiac output syndrome in patients following cardiac surgery using machine learning. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:973147.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Frequency of low cardiac output syndrome following on pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and it's association with degree of pre-operative left ventricular dysfunction. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2023;21:79-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . Development and validation of a machine learning predictive model for perioperative myocardial injury in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19:384.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Artificial intelligence-based prediction of cardiothoracic intensive care unit length of stay: A comparative machine learning approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025:S0022-5223.01041-4.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . A prospective study to assess the impact of diastolic dysfunction on postoperative outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Card Crit Care TSS. 2026;10:37-45.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Post-operative external compression of the right coronary artery following triple valve surgery. J Card Crit Care TSS. 2025;9:130-3.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections