Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
9 (
3
); 156-163
doi:
10.25259/JCCC_12_2025

The Feasibility of Routine Early Extubation after Cardiac Surgery Protocol Generalized to a Nascent, Resource-limited Setup

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Neelam Hospital, Rajpura, Punjab, India
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

*Corresponding author: Deepika Gupta, Assistant Professor, Room No 519, D- Block Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India. smartdeepileo86@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Singh A, Garg S, Gupta D, Kaur ND. The Feasibility of Routine Early Extubation after Cardiac Surgery Protocol Generalized to a Nascent, Resource-limited Setup. J Card Crit Care TSS. 2025;9:156-63. doi: 10.25259/JCCC_12_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

The ultra-fast track protocol using a combination of anesthesia pre-habilitation and intra-operative goal-directed management is increasingly making the extubation of cardiac surgery patients in the operation room feasible. However, the on-table extubation of these patients requires critical evaluation and efforts of the multi-disciplinary experienced team and is practiced only in a few established centers. With this study, the authors aim to evaluate the outcomes of their customized ultra-fast track protocol on the feasibility of on-table and early extubation and its implications on post-operative outcomes in their newly established cardiac surgery setup.

Material and Methods:

This is a retrospective observational study, performed in the operation theater and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) under a tertiary care government teaching hospital between April 2022 and October 2023. Patients aged 1–70 years undergoing elective cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with a customized ultra-fast track anesthesia protocol were included in the study. This is the retrospective chart review of case records, anesthesia, perfusionist, and surgical records. The anesthesia was established using standardized and customized institutional protocols. After completion of surgery, the patients were extubated either in the operation room or in ICU, depending upon the suitability criteria.

Results:

During the study period, of the 96 patients, 30 were included under the ultra-fast track protocol. Out of 30, seven (23.33%) could be extubated on table and five (16.67%) within 6 h of surgery. The post-bypass lactate (1.90 vs. 3.00; P = 0.04) was the major determining factor for the feasibility of on-table extubation. None of the patients extubated on-table were re-intubated. There was no difference in the post-operative surgical, cardiac, and pulmonary outcomes of the three subsets of the patients. The patients extubated early in ICU were younger and had shorter bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (AXC) times with low vasopressor inotropic scores (VISs) with shorter ICU stay (1 day vs. 3.50 days, P = 0.002) and hospital stay (7 days vs. 11.50 days, P = 0.002). The post-operative opioid consumption was lesser (180 mcg fentanyl vs. 400 mcg, P = 0.040). The patient age <46.50 years CPB time 147.50 min AXC time <108 min and VIS <6 could predict early extubation.

Conclusion:

The on-table extubation appears to be safe in patients undergoing ultra-fast track anesthesia with post-bypass lactate levels being the significant determinant. Young patients with short CPB and AXC times and low VIS scores have greater probability of early extubation, with shorter ICU and hospital stay time.

Keywords

Cardiac surgery
Early extubation
Enhanced recovery
Fast track anesthesia
Ultra-fast track anesthesia

INTRODUCTION

The traditional post-operative ventilatory management of a patient after cardiac surgery involves mandatory ventilation for 12–24 h.[1] This was practiced because of frequent low cardiac output conditions and respiratory complications in post-operative cardiac surgical patients. In the past few years, early extubation within <6 h of surgery has shown to improve patient’s recovery[2-4] and is associated with reduced healthcare requirements and hospital costs.[5,6] The ultra-fast track protocol using a combination of ultra-short-acting opioids, inhalational anesthetics, regional anesthesia, normothermic bypass, and point-of-care coagulation management is increasingly making the extubation of cardiac surgery patients in the operation room feasible.[7] However, the on-table extubation of cardiac surgical patients remains debatable and is practiced only in a few well-established, high-volume centers.[3-8] There is limited literature available on the efficacy of this approach in newly established cardiac units with limited working experience. We, with this study, aim to evaluate the outcomes of our customized ultra-fast track protocol on the feasibility of on-table extubation and patient outcomes in our newly established, resource-limited cardiac surgery setup.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observation study patients who underwent cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) conducted between April 2022 and October 2023 in the elective operation theater and post-operatively managed in intensive care unit (ICU) under the department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care of a tertiary care teaching hospital. The data were collected from case records; anesthesia, perfusionist, and surgical records after the Institute Ethical Committee clearance (GMCH/IEC/2024/1293). The STROBE protocol for reporting retrospective data was followed during this study design.

The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class III and IV patients aged 1 month–70 years, who received pre-operative neuraxial analgesia-morphine or local anesthesia, and/or received post-operative chest wall analgesia were included in the study. Those patients with incomplete or missing medical records; who underwent surgery with general anesthesia-only technique during this time; or who were on heparin treatment pre-operatively and could not be given neuraxial analgesia; with deranged coagulation after surgery and could not be given chest wall blocks; with pre-operative left ventricle ejection fraction <35% and/or pre-operative critical clinical status - emergency surgery, cardiogenic shock, acute bacterial endocarditis, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, post-operative intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and with planned post-operative staged extubation and the patients who did not consent for regional anesthesia techniques, were excluded from this study [Figure 1].

The consort diagram depicting the total patients and the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Figure 1:
The consort diagram depicting the total patients and the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Conduct of anesthesia

In the pre-operative period, the patients were counseled regarding weight optimization, smoking cessation, glycemic control, pulmonary exercises, and the post-operative severity of pain. On the night of the surgery, they would receive ringer lactate infusion at 1 mL/kg/h and were prescribed 0.25 mg alprazolam at night and on the morning of surgery.

The standardized intravenous induction of general anesthesia was provided with injection propofol 1–2 mg/kg, ketamine 0.5–1 mg/kg or etomidate 0.2–0.4 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg, and lidocaine 1mg/kg. An adult transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe (X7-2t, 3–8 MHz TEE probe, Phillips CX50®, Koninklijke Phillips, N.V., USA) was inserted after intubation with an appropriately sized endotracheal tube, for pre-repair and post-CPB evaluation of cardiac functions. The neuromuscular monitor (MechanoSensor®; Datex-Ohmeda, GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland) was used to monitor the neuromuscular blockade. The cerebral perfusion was monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy (INVOS™ 5100C, Medtronic, 710 Medtronic Parkway, Minneapolis, USA). A supplementation of 1 mcg/kg of fentanyl was allowed if the heart rate and mean arterial pressure were >20% for more than 60 s. The patients were heparinized using 3–5 mg/kg of intravenous heparin and CPB was instituted after attaining an activated clotting time (ACT) of >450 s. All patients received normothermic or mild hypothermic bypass and ultrafiltration was used during rewarming. Termination of CPB was achieved using a combination of vasopressor and inotropes as indicated by TEE. The heparin was neutralized using injection of protamine 0.8 mg/1 mg of heparin used. The ACT, clotting rate, and platelet functions were checked using Sonoclot© (Sienco, Inc.) at the end of the surgery.

In patients who received neuraxial morphine, the procedure was performed before general anesthesia, in the sitting position, 5 mcg/kg of morphine with 4 mL of normal saline was given at 4th lumbar interspace with 26 gauge Quincke needle. In the patients receiving the chest wall blocks, the procedure was performed after sternum closure and protamine neutralization of heparin with ACT of <120 s. The techniques used were either a combined serratus anterior plane (SAP) block and/or transverse thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) (depending upon the incision site), under ultrasound guidance. In patients undergoing sternotomy, a bilateral TTMPB was given with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Those with thoracotomy were given a combination of SAP and TTMPB block, with 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL given at each site.

After the completion of the surgery, the feasibility of on-table extubation was assessed based on hemodynamic stability, respiratory sufficiency, use of minimum inotropic support, normothermia, adequate hemostasis, an arterial blood gas analysis, and extubated after giving neostigmine and glycopyrrolate based on residual neuromuscular block. Those patients who did not satisfy on-table extubation criteria were transferred to ICU and extubated by the intensivist based on extubation criteria - patient conscious and obeying commands, hemodynamic stability, heart rate and blood pressure within 20% of baseline, minimum inotropic and vasopressor support, chest drain output <4 mL/kg/h, partial pressure of oxygen > 80 mmHg on fraction of inspired oxygen < 0.5, tidal volume 6–8 mL/kg, respiratory rate 12–15/min.

The patients who were extubated in the operating room (OR) were categorized under “ultra-fast track” category. The “early extubation” patients were categorized as those extubated within 6 h of ICU admission and those extubated beyond 6 h were categorized under “delayed extubation” category.

The following complications were recorded in the ICU: Pulmonary complications: Bronchospasm - new wheezing; hypoxemia: Alveolar arterial oxygen gradient >29 mmHg; atelectasis: Abnormal radiological lung findings; pleural effusion; pneumonia - proved: Radiological evidence and pathological documentation; pneumothorax; reintubation within 48 h of extubation. Cardiac complications: Hypotension – fall in blood pressure >20% of baseline or increase in vasopressors; cardiac tamponade; new onset left or right ventricle dysfunction resulting in initiating/increase in inotropes; new onset myocardial infarction - new electrocardiogram changes and/or cardiac enzyme documentation; new-onset atrial or ventricular arrhythmias.

The following data variables were recorded:

  • Patient demographics – Age, sex, comorbidities, ASA status, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) vr 2 risk, Risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery score versus 2.

  • Anesthesia details – Anesthesia agents used, regional anesthesia, fentanyl dose, magnesium sulfate, lidocaine dose, intra-operative echocardiography, inotropic and vasopressor used, lactate, anesthesia-related complications

  • Surgical details – Type of cardiac surgery, duration of surgery, CPB time, aortic cross-clamp (AXC) time, type of cardioplegia, minimum CPB temperature, CPB balance, surgery-related complications

  • Post-operative outcomes – Extubation timings, postoperative pulmonary and cardiac complications, type and dose of ICU analgesia, length of ICU and hospital stay, mortality, if any.

Statistical analysis

The normality of quantitative data was checked by Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. Our variables were non-normally distributed so were represented as median and interquartile range. The comparisons for two groups (gender, duration) were made by Mann–Whitney U test. When we had more than categorical variables, these were reported as counts and percentages. When all expected cell frequencies were more than five, the group comparisons were made with the Chi-square test. The Fisher’s Exact test was used when the expected cell frequencies were less than five. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to find maximal cut-off values of age, weight, and CPB time for extubation duration ≤6 h or more than 6 h. The ROC curve is a plot of sensitivity versus 1-specificity for the maximal cutoff values. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis was conducted using the Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences (SPSS)®, version 22.0 (SPSS Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

Of the 96 patients operated during the study period, 30 patients underwent the fast track protocol [Figure 1]. Of them, seven patients (23.3%) could be extubated on table, five (16.67%) within 6 h of surgery, and 17 patients (56.67%) were extubated after 6 h of surgery.

Demographic status

In our study group, there were ten patients with acyanotic congenital heart disease, three with coronary artery disease, and 17 with valvular heart disease. There were 12% patients in pediatric age (<12 years), while 88% of the patients were adults. The neuraxial morphine and the chest wall blocks were given in 15 of them. Nine patients were operated on by right anterior-lateral thoracotomy technique and a combination of right transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) and serratus anterior muscle block was given to them. The patients with neuraxial block had lower intra-operative fentanyl consumption than the patients who were given chest wall blocks (3.59 ± 1.39 mcg/kg vs. 5.10 ± 1.69 mcg/kg; P = 0.011). The median extubation duration was 13 h (0.25 h–16 h) with ICU stay 3 days (2 days–4 days) and hospital stay of 10 days (7 days– 12 days). There was no difference in the extubation duration of the pediatrics and adult patients (P = 0.172). The pulmonary complications were reported in six, arrhythmias in three, and two patients expired in the immediate post-operative period – one because of severe left ventricle dysfunction and second because of sepsis-related multi-organ dysfunction [Table 1].

Table 1: Patient profile of the total population (n=30)
Variables Results
Sex (Male:Female) 19:11
Age (years) 41.53±19.97
Weight (kg) 57.50 (29.50-57.00)
EuroSCORE (%) 0.75 (0.00-1.04)
RACHS -2 score 0 (0-1)
Anaesthesia parameters
  Neuraxial morphine 15
  Chest wall block 15
  Fentanyl requirement (μg/kg) 4.35±1.70
  Lactate (mmol/dl) 2.77±1.31
  LVEF (%) 51.83±7.59
  RVFAC (%) 43.26±3.08
  VIS score 6.00 (5.00-10.25)
  On tableextubation 7
Surgical parameters
  Diagnosis (ACHD: CCHD: CAD: VHD) 10:0:3:17
  Minimally invasive surgery 9
  CPB time (minutes) 150.27±57.83
  AXC time (minutes) 106.20±49.30
  Cardioplegia (DelNido: St. Thomas) 10:19
  CPB balance (ml) -330.00 (-497.00 TO -122.27)
  CPB temperature °C 32.98±1.69
Post-operative parameters
  Pulmonary complications 6
  Arrythmias 3
  Mortality 2
  Fentanyl (μg) 220.00 (180.00-480.00)
  ICU stay (days) 3 (2-4)
  Extubation duration (hours) 13.00 (0.25-16.00)
  Hospital stay (days) 10 (7-12)

ACHD: Acyanotic congenital heart disease, AXC : Aortic cross clamp time, CAD: Coronary artery disease, CCHD: Cyanotic congenital heart disease, CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass, EuroSCORE: European System for cardiac operative risk evaluation, ICU : Intensive care unit, LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction, RACHS: Risk stratification for congenital heart surgery, μg: Microgram, mmol : mili-mol, RVFAC: Right ventricular fractional area change, VHD: Valvular heart disease, VIS: Vasoactive inotropic score, °C: Degree celsius.

Ultra-fast track extubation group

The intra-operative post-CPB lactate was lower in patients extubated on table (2.00 mmoL/dL [1.20–2.40] vs. 2.80 [1.98–4.52]; P = 0.028). There was no re-intubation in these patients. The use of either neuraxial morphine or chest wall block neither had any effect on the duration of extubation (10.17 ± 7.57 h vs. 7.63 ± 9.15; P = 0.290) nor on the incidence of on-table extubation (14.3% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.231). The incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications (P = 1.00) and arrhythmias (P = 0.557) was not significantly different between the patients who were extubated on table and those who had delayed extubation. The median ICU stay (3 days [2–3] vs. 3 days [2–5]; P = 0.684) and hospital stay (7 days [6–9] vs. 10 days [7–13]; P = 0.074) was equal between the two sets of patients [Table 2].

Table 2: Comparative assessment of patients undergoing ultra-fastrack vs non- ultra-fastrack extubation
Pre-operative parameters
Variables Ultra-fastrack patients (n=7) Non- Ultra-fastrack patients (n=22) P- value
Sex (Male:Female) (5:2) (14:8) 1.00
Age (years) 38.00 (25.00-60.00) 46.50(32.75-57.25) 0.475
Weight (kgs) 57.00 (47.00-65.00) 58.50(51.75-71.75) 0.460
EuroSCORE (%) 0.56 (0.00- 1.40) 0.79 (0-1.03) 0.662
RACHS -II score 0 (0-2) 0(0-1) 0.648
Anaesthesia parameters
  Neuraxial morphine 1 13 0.080
  Chest wall block 5 10 0.390
  Fentanyl requirement (μg/kg) 4.61 (3.63 – 5.31) 3.54 (2.52-5.64) 0.476
  Amiodarone (mg) 0 (0-150) 75(0-300) 0.203
  Lidocaine (mg) 60 (40-80) 60 (47.50-85) 0.624
  Lactate (mmol/dl) 2.00(1.20 -2.40) 2.80 (1.98-4.52) 0.028*
  LVEF (%) 43.18 2.90 51.36± 7.74 0.416
  RVFAC (%) 44.71 1.60 43.18±2.90 0.326
  VIS score 5.00(4.00-10.00) 6.0 (5.0-10.25) 0.717
Surgical parameters
  Diagnosis (ACHD: CCHD CAD: VHD) 2:0:1:4 7:0:2:13 0.923
  Minimally invasive surgery 3 6 0.642
  CPB time (minutes) 145.00(116.00-155.00) 159.00 (106.75-226.00) 0.268
  AXC time (minutes) 107.00(76.00-130.00) 106.00 (69.00-143.75) 0.878
  Cardioplegia (DelNido: St. Thomas) (2:5) (7:14) 0.825
  CPB balance (ml) -410.00(-450.00 to -125.00) -330 (-537.50 to -164.50) 0.683
  CPB temperature °C 34.00 (32.30-34.00) 32.50 (32.00-34.12) 0.268
Post-operative parameters
  Pulmonary complications 1 5 1.000
  Arrythmias 0 3 0.557
  Fentanyl (μg) 220.00(180.00-480.00) 230.00(160.00-480.00) 0.898
  ICU stay (days) 3 (2-3) 3 (2-5) 0.684
  Hospital stay (days) 7 (6-9) 10 (7-13) 0.074

ACHD: Acyanotic congenital heart disease, AXC : Aortic cross clamp time, CAD: Coronary artery disease, CCHD: Cyanotic congenital heart disease, CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass, EuroSCORE: European System for cardiac operative risk evaluation, ICU : Intensive care unit, LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction, RACHS: Risk stratification for congenital heart surgery, μg: Microgram, mmol : mili-mol, RVFAC: Right ventricular fractional area change, VHD: Valvular heart disease, VIS: Vasoactive inotropic score, oC : Degree Celcius, p<0.05: Considered significant. *p value statistically significant

Patients extubated in ICU

The pre-operative parameters of age (26.00 years [5.00– 41.50] vs. 48.00 years [40.50–61.50], P = 0.009) and weight (50.00 kg [13.80–52.00] vs. 61.00 kg [55.50–76.10], P = 0.003) were lower in patients extubated in ≤6 h [Table 3].

Table 3: Comparative assessment of patients extubated in ICU (n=22)
Pre-operative parameters
Variables Patients extubated
≤ 6 hours (n= 5)
Patients extubated
> 6 hours (n=17)
P-value
Sex (Male:Female) 2:3 12: 5 0.309
Age (years) 26.00(5.00-41.50) 48.00(40.50-61.50) 0.009*
Weight (kgs) 50.00(13.80-52.00) 61.00(55.50-76.10) 0.003*
EuroSCORE (%) 0.00(0.00-0.61) 0.87(0.62-1.04) 0.063
RACHS -II score 1 (0-1) 0 0.003*
Anaesthesia parameters
  Neuraxial morphine 2 11 0.609
  Chest wall block 3 7 0.624
  Fentanyl requirement (μg/kg) 5.66 (2.20-5.94) 3.39(2.63-5.40) 0.784
  Amiodarone (mg) 0(0-225) 150(0-300) 0.608
  Lidocaine (mg) 60(0-60) 80(50-100) 0.073
  Lactate (mmol/dl) 2.10(1.97-2.96) 2.90(2.12- 4.82) 0.308
  LVEF (%) 54.00 ±7.41 50.58 ±7.88 0.446
  RVFAC (%) 41.60 ±4.39 43.69±2.28 0.431
  VIS score 4.00(1.50-6.50) 8.00(5.00-11.50) 0.021*
Surgical parameters
  Diagnosis (ACHD: CCHD: CAD: VHD) 4:0:0:1 3:0:2:12 0.030*
  Minimally invasive surgery 1 5 1.000
  CPB time (minutes) 82.00(62.00-110.50) 173.00(129.00-234.00) 0.007*
  AXC time (minutes) 51.00(33.00-70.00) 122.00(95.50-165.50) 0.005*
  Cardioplegia (DelNido: St. Thomas) 1:4 6:10 0.654
  CPB balance (ml) -400 (-750.00 to -193.00) -310(-498 to -51) 0.433
  CPB temperature °C 34.00(31.70-34.50) 32.50 (32.00-34.00) 0.636
Post-operative parameters
  Extubation duration (hours) 3.00(0.5-3.50) 16.00(14.50-18.50)
  Pulmonary complications 1 5 0.354
  Arrythmias 0 3 1.000
  Fentanyl (μg) 180.00(50.00-200.00) 400.00(180.00-480.00) 0.040*
  ICU stay (days) 1(1-2) 3.50(2.25-6.00) 0.002*
  Hospital stay (days) 7 (5.50-7.50) 11.50(10-14.75) 0.002*

ACHD: Acyanotic congenital heart disease, AXC : Aortic cross clamp time, CAD: Coronary artery disease, CCHD: Cyanotic congenital heart disease, CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass, EuroSCORE: European System for cardiac operative risk evaluation, ICU : Intensive care unit, LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction, RACHS: Risk stratification for congenital heart surgery, μg: microgram, mmol : mili-mol, RVFAC: Right ventricular fractional area change, VHD: Valvular heart disease, VIS: Vasoactive inotropic score, oC : Degree Celcius, p<0.05: Considered significant. *p value statistically significant

The intra-operative parameters of CPB time (82.00 min [62.00– 110.50] vs. 173.00 min [129.00–234.00], P = 0.007), AXC time (51.00 min [33.00–70.00] vs. 122.00 min [95.50–165.50], P = 0.005), and VIS score (4.00 [1.50–6.50] vs. 8.00 [5.00–11.50], P = 0.021) were significantly lower in patients extubated ≤6 h.

The post-operative fentanyl consumption was lesser in patients extubated ≤6 h 180.00 μg (50.00–200.00) versus 400.00 μg (180.00–480.00), P = 0.040. There was no significant difference in the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications (P = 0.354) and arrhythmias (P = 1.000) among the patients.

The median ICU stay of patients extubated ≤6 h was 1 day (1–2) versus 3.50 days (2.25–6.00), P = 0.002 and the median hospital stay was 7 days (5.50–7.50) versus 11.50 days (10–14.75), P = 0.002, compared to patients extubated >6 h of surgery.

Sensitivity analysis

The patient age of >46.50 years (sensitivity 64.7%, specificity 83.3%, P = 0.01), weight >57.50 kg (sensitivity 70.6%, specificity 75%, P = 0.007), CPB time >147.50 min (sensitivity 70.6%, specificity 75%, P = 0.010), AXC time >108 min (sensitivity 64.7%, specificity 75%, P = 0.021), and VIS >6 (sensitivity 58%, specificity 66.7%, P = 0.054) could predict a post-operative mechanical ventilation duration of more than 6 h [Figure 2].

The ROC showing age, weight, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), CBP, and AXC time as significant predictors of postoperative mechanical ventilation duration of more than 6 h. AXC: Aortic cross-clamp time, CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass time, ROC: Receiver operating characteristic curve.
Figure 2:
The ROC showing age, weight, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), CBP, and AXC time as significant predictors of postoperative mechanical ventilation duration of more than 6 h. AXC: Aortic cross-clamp time, CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass time, ROC: Receiver operating characteristic curve.

DISCUSSION

Our study shows the feasibility and safety of ultra-fast track extubation of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB under combined general and regional anesthesia in a new cardiac surgery setup. Early extubation provided shorter ICU stay and early discharge to home for these patients.

The OR extubation is practiced in limited high-volume centers, having a well-established team for peri-operative patient care.[2,3,6,9] However, ours was a newly established cardiac surgical setup in a tertiary teaching hospital of < 3 years old, with limited resources and staffing experience with peri-operative management of these critically ill patients. This shows that the learning made from the larger experienced centers can be replicated safely at a smaller center [Table 3].[10]

In the previous studies, hemodynamic stability, adequate respiratory functions, normothermia, normal acid-base status, and neurological responsiveness have been the primary criteria for on-table extubation readiness.[3,9,11,12] The intra-operative lactate is an independent predictor for post-operative morbidity and mortality and may be used as a tool for predicting an extubation success.[13] Aksoy et al. demonstrated an intraoperative lactate of 3.1 ± 1.8 mmoL/dL in patients who could be extubated within 24 h of surgery.[14] In our patients, the intra-operative post-CPB lactate was lesser in patients extubated in the OR (2.00 mmoL/dL [1.20–2.40] vs. 2.80 [1.98–4.52]; P = 0.028). This was measured after stabilization of cardiac output using inotropes, vasopressors, fluids, and blood and components after separation from CPB.

There is an incidence of 10.3–16.3% of post-operative arrhythmias and 0.6–2.5% of respiratory complications in patients extubated on table,[3,12] but the effect of early extubation is unknown. There was no difference in the incidence of post-operative arrhythmias (0 vs. 3; P = 0.557) and pulmonary complications (1 vs. 5, P = 1.000) in our patients who were extubated in OR versus those with delayed extubation. Salah et al.[6] showed that on-table extubation decreases the length of ICU stay (57.4 h vs. 95 h, P < 0.0001); however, there was no significant difference in the ICU and hospital stay duration in our patients who were extubated on table. However, the patients who were extubated early in the ICU had shorter lengths of ICU and hospital stay. This can be because of the confounding functions affecting the need of post-operative ICU care.[15] The insufficient step down beds in a resource-limited setting with limited staffing plays a significant contribution to the delay in hospital discharge.

This study also showed the feasibility and safety of early extubation within 6 h of surgery. An age >60 years, obesity, high EuroSCORE, prolong AXC time, and CPB time >120 min have been previously identified as risk factors for prolonged intubation.[2,3,6,16] We identified age >46.50 years, weight >57.50 kg, CPB time >147.50 min, and AXC time >108 min as predictors of extubation after 6 h. Rheumatic carditis worsens with increasing age, which may be the reason for increased intubation times. Obesity is associated with decreased functional residual capacity and restrictive lung disease, and this is worsened with muscle relaxants and supine position.[2]

In addition, increased use of inotropes is associated with delayed extubation,[2] similar to demonstrated in our study - VIS >6. The multi-modal analgesia provided by fentanyl, spinal morphine, SAP TTMPB, and acetaminophen reduced the postoperative opioid requirements of the patients, which could have contributed to the decreased intubation time.[17]

The cost of cardiac surgery remains a challenge for families visiting government hospitals where the majority of the funding comes from government finances, government schemes like Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (a consolidated grant of 6,000 USD), and aid by non-government organizations.[18] At the initiation of our protocol, we adjudged the long-term ICU stay of our patients as this medical and economic burden. A multi-disciplinary team consisting of surgeons, anesthesiologists, perfusionists, physiotherapists, and post-operative nursing staff was created to achieve consistent and non-complicated post-operative outcomes. The protocols were adjusted to have a local fit. We aim to achieve sustainment in the program by routine doctor-to-patient, patient-to-patient, and team educational activities with routine re-assessment of protocols.[19-21]

Limitations

The post-operative perception of pain is a major determinant of the success of ultra-fast track extubation[3] and both neuraxial morphine and anterior chest wall blocks are helpful analgesia adjuvants along with general anesthesia.[10,22] Our study data collected retrospectively was done in a short period of 19 months and in a small group of patients. Although the inclusion criteria were strictly followed, we cannot completely rule out selection bias and non-random sampling.[23,24] Future longitudinal studies are required to validate the causality of association between post-CPB lactate levels, age, weight, CPB and AXC times, and VIS scores to the duration of extubation.

CONCLUSION

The on-table extubation appears to be safe and feasible in a newly established, resource-limited cardiac surgery set-up. The post-bypass lactate levels are the significant determinant of the success of ultra-fast track extubation. The multi-modal analgesia reduced opioid consumption, facilitating early extubation with shorter ICU stay and early discharge to home after cardiac surgery.

Ethical approval:

The research/study approved by the Institutional Review Board at Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, number GMCH/IEC/2024/1293, dated 25th May 2024.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , . The Management of the Severely Ill Patient after Open-Heart Surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963;45:80-90.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Risk Factors of Delayed Extubation, Prolonged Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit, and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft with Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia: A New Cardiac Risk Score. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:936-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Routine Immediate Extubation after off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: 514 Consecutive Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19:282-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Fast-Track Anesthesia and Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 7989 Patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:727-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Fast-Track Failure after Cardiac Surgery: External Model Validation and Implications to ICU Bed Utilization. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1205-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Impact of Immediate Versus Delayed Tracheal Extubation on Length of ICU Stay of Cardiac Surgical Patients, a Randomized Trial. Heart Lung Vessel. 2015;7:311-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society Recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:755-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. The Lack of Benefit of Tracheal Extubation in the Operating Room after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:776-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Immediate Extubation after off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in 1,196 Consecutive Patients: Feasibility, Safety and Predictors of when Not to Attempt it. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:431-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . History of Cardiac Anesthesia in India. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32:2344-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Ultra Fast-Tracking Versus a Conventional Strategy in Valve Replacement Surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57:298-300.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Comparison of Immediate Extubation Versus Ultrafast Tracking Strategy in the Management of off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018;21:129-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Evaluation of Increase in Intraoperative Lactate Level as a Predictor of Outcome in Adults after Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020;34:877-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Predictive Factors of Prolonged Ventilation Following Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;36:780-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Implementation of an Early Extubation Protocol in Cardiac Surgical Patients Decreased Ventilator Time But Not Intensive Care Unit or Hospital Length of Stay. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32:739-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Predictors of Failure in Fast-Track Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:1466-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Assessment of a Multimodal Analgesia Protocol to Allow the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Analysis of Patient Outcomes. J Clin Anesth. 2019;54:76-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Pediatric Cardiac Procedures in India: Who Bears the Cost? Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2024;17:1-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , . The Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Impact Framework: Measuring the Real-World Impact of Implementation Science. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36:396-403.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . On-Table Extubation Facilitated by Regional Analgesic Techniques Combined with General Anesthesia for PDA Ligation: A Case-Series and Literature Review. J Card Crit Care TSS. 2023;7:153-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Fast-Track Extubation in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery in Developing Countries. J Card Crit Care. 2017;1:21-3.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Low-Dose Intrathecal Morphine Does Not Delay Early Extubation after Cardiac Surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:848-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . How to Write a Retrospective Observational Study. Anaesthesia. 2023;78:521-25.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Fast-Track Extubation in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery in Developing Countries. J Card Crit Care TSS. 2017;1:21-3.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections