Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Report
Cardiac Critical Care, Case Series
Cardiac Critical Care, Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Invited Editorial
Cardiac Critical Care, Original Article
Cardiac Critical Care, Point of Technique
Cardiac Critical Care, Review Article
Case Report
Case Report, Cardiac Critical Care
Case Series
Case Series, Cardiac Critical Care
Editorial
Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Editorial, Cardiac Critical Care
JCCC Quiz, Cardiac Critical Care
Legends in Cardiac Sciences
Letter to Editor
Letter To Editor Response
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Anesthesia
Letter to Editor, Cardiac Critical Care
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review, Cardiac Critical Care
Notice of Retraction
Original Article
Original Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Original Article, Cardiology
Perspective
Perspective Insights
Perspective, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of Technique
Point of Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Point of View, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article
Review Article, Cardiac Critical Care
Review Article, Cardiology
Review Article, Evidence Based Medicine
Review Article, Invited
Short Communication
Short Communication, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique, Cardiac Critical Care
Surgical Technique, Cardiology
Systematic Review
Technical Note
Video Case Report
Video Commentary
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JCCC_10_2026

Outcomes of Arterial Switch Operation in Children with Transposition of Great Arteries Older than Two Weeks

Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

*Corresponding author: Sarvesh Pal Singh,Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. sarveshpal.singh@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Khan MS, Raheja D, Bharath V, Singh SP, Sahu M. Outcomes of Arterial Switch Operation in Children with Transposition of Great Arteries Older than Two Weeks. J Card Crit Care TSS. doi: 10.25259/ JCCC_10_2026

Abstract

Objectives:

The Arterial Switch Operation (ASO) was first performed by Dr. Adib Dominos Jatene in 1975. At present, the ASO described by Jatene, using the Lecompte maneuver, is considered the gold standard for the treatment of transposition of the great arteries (TGA). The ASO, although complex, has good results when performed within the first 2 weeks of life. Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes of the ASO in children older than 2 weeks with TGA, performed by a single surgeon.

Material and Methods:

After institutional ethics committee approval, the medical records of children older than 2 weeks who underwent ASO for TGA by a single surgeon between April 2021 and April 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. All 31 children received the same standardized anesthetic management and conduct of cardiopulmonary bypass. The following postoperative variables were recorded – postoperative bleeding/total drain output, mediastinal exploration for postoperative bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, inotropic score (IS), neurological dysfunction (seizures, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy), sepsis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, tracheostomy, delayed sternal closure, and 30 days mortality.

Results:

The 30-day mortality rate was 32.2% (10/31). For analysis, children were divided into two groups: survivors and non-survivors at 30-day post-surgery. AKI occurred in 90% of non-survivors versus 23.8% of survivors (P = 0.001). Non-survivors had a significantly higher (P < 0.001) incidence of postoperative complications, septic shock, intrapulmonary hemorrhage, or refractory cardiogenic shock. Non-survivors also had significantly higher ISs (27.00 ± 9.49 vs. 18.24 ± 6.80; P = 0.007), higher total drain output (36.34 ± 13.12 vs. 24.32 ± 11.41 mL/kg; P = 0.026), and significantly shorter ICU stay (5.56 ± 5.57 vs. 18.76 ± 15.99 days; P = 0.012).

Conclusion:

The mortality in children who are more than 2 weeks old and undergo an ASO is 32.2%. In this cohort, age and preoperative balloon atrial septostomy were not associated with 30-day mortality. AKI and other postoperative complications, such as sepsis and left ventricular failure, were associated with increased mortality. Postoperative parameters, such as IS and total drain output, also showed strong associations with 30-day mortality.

Keywords

Arterial
Children
Operation
Switch
Two
Weeks

INTRODUCTION

In transposition of the great arteries (TGA), the aorta arises from the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery (PA) from the left ventricle (LV).[1] If untreated, 90% of babies with Dextro TGA (d-TGA) do not survive the 1st year of life. The Arterial Switch Operation (ASO) was first performed by Dr Adib Dominos Jatene in 1975. Since then, mortality and morbidity have decreased considerably due to improvements in equipment, techniques (e.g., the LeCompte maneuver), and imaging. At present, the ASO described by Jatene, using the Lecompte maneuver,is considered the gold standard for the treatment of TGA. The transfer of the coronary arteries during ASO is a critical factor in determining the procedure’s success.[2] Children undergoing ASO sometimes require extracorporeal support in the immediate postoperative period for the failing LV. This extra therapy adds to the morbidity and mortality of children. The ASO, although complex, has good results when performed within the first 2 weeks of life.

Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes of the ASO in children older than 2 weeks with TGA, performed by a single surgeon.

The primary objective was to determine 30 days inhospital mortality after surgery. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, postoperative complications, and their correlation with outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After institutional ethics committee approval, the medical records of children older than 2 weeks who underwent ASO for TGA by a single surgeon between April 2021 and April 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. All 31 children received the same standardized anesthetic management and conduct of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Surgery was performed under moderate hypothermia (rectal temperature 28°C). After weaning from CPB, controlled ultrafiltration was performed to remove inflammatory mediators (cytokines) from the blood and to reduce fluid accumulation in the extracellular space. Despite these measures, if the child had severe myocardial edema with or without hemodynamic compromise, the sternal closure was delayed until the patient was stabilized. Children were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) either in the operating room (as an aid to come off CPB) or in the ICU (for low cardiac output syndrome). The low cardiac output syndrome in these children has been defined in our earlier publication.[3]All the children were shifted to the ICU in the postoperative period.

A tracheostomy was performed in children who were hemodynamically stable, afebrile and on mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days with no expectation of extubation in the next 72 h.

Surgical technique

The standard surgical steps included aorto-bicaval cannulation, PA mobilization, careful division of the patent ductus arteriosus, cold cardioplegia, transection of aorta, coronary button harvesting, transection of PA, coronary button implantation on neoaorta, LeCompte maneuver, aortic anastomosis, closure of the atrial septal defect, right atrium closure, clamp removal, patch closure of the coronary donor sites on neo PA, completion of the pulmonary anastomosis, slow weaning from CPB, and finally, decannulation.

Just after pericardiotomy, coronary anatomy was assessed, and the PA was marked with 6-0 Prolene suture for the exact site of coronary button implantation as “estimated” by the length and lie of the coronary ostium on the aorta. For the actual coronary button implant, a slit incision was made on the PA (later to be neoaorta) at the site of the Prolene marker stitch; this slit incision was enlarged to a circular incision, and the button was anastomosed with 8-0 Prolene continuous suturing (no trap-door technique).

The posterior and lateral aspects of the neo-pulmonary root were reconstructed using a pantaloon-shaped, untreated, autologous pericardial patch (approximate size: 3 × 1.5 cm). To prevent excess stretching of the branch pulmonary arteries, an additional pericardial patch was sutured on the anterior aspect of the neo PA (approximate size 8 × 10 mm).

The following postoperative variables were recorded – postoperative bleeding/total drain output, mediastinal exploration for postoperative bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU and hospital stay, inotropic score (IS), neurological dysfunction (seizures, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy), sepsis, ECMO use, tracheostomy, delayed sternal closure, and 30-day mortality.

Any mediastinal chest tube drainage exceeding 5% of estimated blood volume (EBV) for more than 3 consecutive hours or exceeding 10% of EBV for 1 h was used as the criterion for mediastinal exploration. In some cases, the decision was influenced by the judgment of surgeons and intensivists based on their experience and available evidence. AKI was diagnosed according to KDIGO criteria.[4] Culture of microorganisms from respiratory tract secretions after 48 h of mechanical ventilation, combined with radiological findings (consolidation and/or collapse on chest X-ray or high-resolution computed tomography chest), biochemical markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin), and clinical signs (bronchial breath sounds, wheezes, crepitations) in the child, was diagnostic of VAP.

Patients with persistent systemic inflammatory response syndrome 48 h after surgery, with evidence of infection, a new onset of organ dysfunction (with or without the need for additional vasopressor support) threatening life, were considered to have sepsis. Positive cultures from any of the following specimens – blood, urine, tracheal secretions, bronchoalveolar lavage, chest drain fluid, surgical site tissue, mediastinal clot (delayed sternal closure), egressing dialysate fluid (in patients on peritoneal dialysis), central venous pressure tip, and surgical specimen – were regarded as conclusive evidence of sepsis. In children with negative cultures but clinical features of sepsis, the diagnosis was based on radiological and biochemical evidence.

Postoperative chylothorax was diagnosed on the basis of triglyceride levels (>110 mg/dL) and the presence of lymphocytes (70–80%) in the pleural fluid.[5]

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range based on their distribution, while categorical variables were presented as absolute frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables were assessed using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 31 TGA children who underwent ASO, 23 were male, and eight were female. The mean age was 4.62 ± 7.85 months, and the mean weight was 4.13 ± 1.86 kg. Seventeen children (54.8%) underwent balloon atrial septostomy (BAS), and one patient underwent BAS + Coarctation of the aorta repair before ASO. Out of 31 children, 19 had a “prepared” LV, 13 had a ventricular septal defect (VSD), and 13 children required ECMO support in the postoperative period. The mean aortic cross-clamp time and CPB time were 103.13 ± 15.65 min and 173.77 ± 30.92 min, respectively.

In an earlier publication from our institute, a “prepared LV” has been defined as where the LV is D-shaped, and the intact ventricular septum (IVS) moves with LV, whereas a banana-shaped LV, where IVS moves with RV, is said to be “regressed.”[6]Surgery in children who had a regressed LV was at risk of developing left ventricular failure and, therefore, was planned with the support of ECMO in the postoperative period.

The 30-day mortality rate was 32.2% (10/31). For analysis, children were divided into two groups: Survivors and non-survivors at 30-day post-surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic characteristics, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative characteristics, i.e., CPB and aortic cross-clamp time (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation, perioperative ECMO requirement, re-exploration, need for tracheostomy, and incidence of VAP [Table 1].

Table 1: Association between 30-day mortality and different variables.
Parameters 30-day mortality P-value
Yes (Non- survivor at 30 days) (n=10) (%) No (Survivor at 30 days) (n=21) (%)
Age (Months) 7.88±11.94 3.06±4.52 0.7351
Gender 0.2222
Male 9 (90.0) 14 (66.7)
Female 1 (10.0) 7 (33.3)
Height/Length (cm) 60.40±13.64 56.19±5.53 0.9661
Weight (kg) 4.95±3.00 3.74±0.79 0.9161
Body surface area (m2) 0.27±0.12 0.23±0.04 0.8311
Aortic cross clamp time (min) 105.70±19.44 101.90±13.88 0.6421
CPB time (min) 186.00±44.13 167.95±21.15 0.3741
Duration of mechanical ventilation (Days) 7.25±6.54 12.81±15.47 0.2791
Inotropic score*** 27.00±9.49 18.24±6.80 0.0071
Need for tracheostomy (Yes) 0 (0.0) 4 (19.0) 0.2772
VAP (Yes) 4 (40.0) 5 (23.8) 0.4172
AKI (Yes)*** 9 (90.0) 5 (23.8) 0.0012
Arrhythmias (Yes) 0 (0.0) 1 (4.8) 1.0002
Duration of ICU stay (Days)*** 5.56±5.57 18.76±15.99 0.0121
Sternum closure on POD 5.00±4.24 2.52±0.98 0.4761
Total drain output (mL/kg)*** 36.34±13.12 24.32±11.41 0.0261
Re-exploration (Yes) 4 (40.0) 9 (42.9) 1.0002
Post-op complications (Yes)*** 10 (100.0) 5 (23.8) <0.0012
Complications*** <0.0012
None 0 (0.0) 16 (76.2)
Septic shock 3 (30.0) 3 (14.3)
Intrapulmonary hemorrhage 3 (30.0) 0 (0.0)
Refractory cardiogenic shock 3 (30.0) 0 (0.0)
Chylothorax 0 (0.0) 1 (4.8)
HIE 1 (10.0) 0 (0.0)
Sternal site infection 0 (0.0) 1 (4.8)
Total duration of hospital stay (Days)*** 12.50±5.54 40.43±25.47 <0.0011
Pre-op surgery/procedure 0.3042
BAS 6 (60.0) 11 (52.4)
None 3 (30.0) 10 (47.6)
BAS and CoA repair 1 (10.0) 0 (0.0)
ECMO requirement (Yes) 6 (60.0) 7 (33.3) 0.2472
ECHO diagnosis 0.7012
TGA with intact IVS 5 (50.0) 13 (61.9)
TGA with VSD 5 (50.0) 8 (38.1)
Type of LV 0.4472
Prepared LV 5 (50.0) 14 (66.7)
Regressed LV 5 (50.0) 7 (33.3)
Days of hospitalization before surgery 8.20±5.09 18.90±21.18 0.1331
Significant at P<0.05, 1Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney U test, 2Fisher’s exact test, 3Chi-squared test. AKI: Acute kidney injury, BAS: Balloon atrial septostomy, CoA: Coarctation of the aorta, CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass, ECMO: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ICU: Intensive care unit, IVS: Intact ventricular septum, HIE: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, POD: Post-operative day, TGA: Transposition of the great arteries, VAP: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, VSD: Ventricular septal defect, LV: Left ventricle.

AKI occurred in 90% of non-survivors vs. 23.8% of survivors (P = 0.001). Non-survivors had a significantly higher (P < 0.001) incidence of postoperative complications, septic shock, intrapulmonary hemorrhage, or refractory cardiogenic shock [Table 1].

The total duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the non-survivor group (12.50 ± 5.54 vs. 40.43 ± 25.47 days). Among the survivors, 16 children were alive at 1 year after surgery, and five were lost to follow-up.

Several postoperative variables were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Non-survivors had significantly higher ISs (27.00 ± 9.49 vs. 18.24 ± 6.80; P = 0.007), higher total drain output (36.34 ± 13.12 vs. 24.32 ± 11.41 mL/kg; P = 0.026), and significantly shorter ICU stay (5.56 ± 5.57 vs. 18.76 ± 15.99 days; P = 0.012) compared to survivors, reflecting early deterioration leading to death [Table 1].

DISCUSSION

In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of the ASO performed in patients with TGA who were older than 2 weeks. The mean age of the children at the time of surgery was 4.62 months (median - 2 months). In India, children often present late, with further delay in surgery due to various reasons. A lack of resources in developing countries often leads to delayed diagnosis and late presentation.[7] In our study, 9 children were 2–4 weeks old, and 22 were more than 1 month old at the time of surgery. In almost all cases, children with TGA and an intact ventricular septum undergo BAS to address the immediate issue of insufficient oxygenation. In our study, 18 of 31 children with TGA and an IVS had undergone BAS.

The ASO should ideally be performed in the 1st week of life to minimize left ventricular deconditioning. In the retrospective cohort study by Anderson et al., 140 patients underwent ASO, with a median age at operation of 5 days (range 1–12 days). It was concluded that delaying the ASO beyond 3 days of age increases major morbidity by 47% and healthcare costs by 8%.[8] However, all the children in our study were older than 12 days.

The 30-day mortality rate in our children was 32.2%. In our cohort, the age of children at the time of surgery was more than 2 weeks (median age 2 months) and children who underwent BAS were operated on more than 24 h later. The mortality is high when compared to published results of ASO in neonates from high-volume centers (typically <10%).[9]However, when comparing studies involving late presenters, such as the study by Jonas et al., which included 127 patients who underwent an ASO from 1977 to 2020 at a single center, the outcomes are comparable. Their surgical mortality rate during the entire study period was 24.6%.[10]

Out of 18 children who underwent BAS and later ASO, 10 children (55%) required ECMO, and of those 10 children, 5 expired. Three (22.3%) out of 13 children with TGA and VSD who required ECMO support died. Overall, 13 of 31 patients (42.6%) required ECMO postoperatively, and the survival rate in this subset was 53.8% (7 of 13). The use of ECMO support in children did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors, as the decision to use ECMO was based on the ventricle’s preparedness before surgery and the development of low cardiac output syndrome in the postoperative period. Yang et al. performed a retrospective study of 16 pediatric patients with d-TGA requiring ECMO support from July 2007 to Dec 2019. Two patients were on ECMO support in the preoperative period, whereas 14 patients required ECMO support only postoperatively. Of these 14 children, seven survived to discharge (50% survival).[11]

No significant association was found between age, weight, body surface area (BSA), and 30-day mortality. There was no effect of age on survival because all our patients underwent surgery well beyond the recommended age of <2 weeks. Furthermore, preoperative BAS in our children did not affect mortality. Hamzah et al. studied 17,392 neonates to evaluate preoperative BAS as a risk factor for mortality in children undergoing ASO. They also did not find any significant difference in mortality between patients who underwent preoperative BAS vs those who did not (6.3% vs 6.7%; P = 0.29).[12] Similarly, intraoperative variables – including cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time – did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors, suggesting that surgical and technical factors were consistent across the cohort.

In our study, AKI and other postoperative complications (sepsis, left ventricular failure, etc.) were associated with increased mortality. Postoperative parameters such as IS, AKI, and total drain output also showed strong associations with 30-day mortality.

Higher ISs in the non-survivor group likely reflect more significant myocardial dysfunction postoperatively and are an established predictor of poor outcomes following neonatal and infant cardiac surgery.[13-15] Prolonged ICU and hospital stay in the survivor group further indicate the complexity of postoperative recovery in these high-risk patients.

Postoperative complications – notably septic shock, intrapulmonary hemorrhage, refractory cardiogenic shock, and AKI were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) as a result of long cardiopulmonary bypass and sepsis is a major determinant of mortality after ASO and other complex congenital cardiac surgeries.[16] In a study done by Ben-Abraham et al. in 722 pediatric patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery, MODS was the major cause of mortality in the 1st post-operative week.[17]

The incidence of AKI in non-survivors was significantly higher than in survivors (P < 0.001). There are multiple reasons for developing AKI in children undergoing ASO – immature kidneys, preoperative medications like diuretics, antibiotics, contrast agents (BAS), dehydration (diarrhea, fever, viral infections), CPB time more than 2 h systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), vasopressors, low cardiac output state, hypothermia, post-operative bleeding and blood transfusion, infection, liver dysfunction and nephrotoxic medicines in postoperative period. AKI is a well-documented independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing ASO and may reflect a low cardiac output state, renal hypoperfusion, and systemic inflammation postoperatively - all of which may have contributed to poorer outcomes in our cohort.[18-20]

Limitations

This study has limitations inherent to its retrospective design and small sample size, and as a single-surgeon, single-center experience, the findings may not be generalizable to all clinical settings. However, the uniformity of surgical technique and perioperative management strengthens internal validity and provides valuable insights into the challenges of managing late-presenting TGA patients.

CONCLUSION

The mortality in children who are more than 2 weeks old and undergo an ASO is 32.2%. In this cohort, age and preoperative BAS are not associated with 30-day mortality. AKI and other postoperative complications, such as sepsis and left ventricular failure, were associated with increased mortality. Postoperative parameters, such as IS and total drain output, also showed strong associations with 30-day mortality.

Authors’ contributions:

MSK: Methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing - original draft, data curation; DR: Methodology, software, formal analysis, resources; BV: Methodology, validation, data curation, resources, writing - original draft; SPS: Conceptualization, methodology, writing, review & editing, validation - final draft; MS: Supervision, writing - review & editing, data curation, validation.

Ethical approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, number AIIMSA00447/18.01.2024, dated 07th February 2024.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

Dr. Sarvesh Pal Singh, and Dr. Manoj Sahu is on the Editorial Board of the Journal.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . The Morbid Anatomy of Some of the Most Important Parts of the Human Body London, UK: Johnson and Nichol; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. D-transposition of the great arteries: The current era of the arterial switch operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:498-511.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Outcome of cardiac ECMO in children less than 1 year age undergoing corrective cardiac surgery. J Card Crit Care. 2020;4:25-32.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1-138.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Postoperative chylothorax in neonates and infants after congenital heart disease surgery-current aspects in diagnosis and treatment. Nutrients. 2022;14:1803.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . An electron microscopic study of left ventricular regression in children with transposition of great arteries. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11:768-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Surgery for TGA in developing countries: The end of the beginning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:52-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Earlier arterial switch operation improves outcomes and reduces costs for neonates with transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:481-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Outcomes of the arterial switch for transposition during infancy using a standardized approach over 30 years. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023;36:ivad070.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Early and late outcomes after arterial switch operation: A 40-year journey in a single low case volume center. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57:906.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Lessons learned from ECMO support in pediatric patients with D-transposition of the great arteries: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. World J Pediatr Surg. 2021;4:e000273.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Prevalence and outcomes of balloon atrial septostomy in neonates with transposition of great arteries. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21:324-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Vasoactive-inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11:234-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Vasoactive inotropic score and outcome assessment in cyanotic infants after cardiovascular surgery. J Card Crit Care. 2018;2:25-31.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Predictive value of vasoactive-inotropic score for mortality in newborns undergoing cardiac surgery. Indian Pediatr. 2019;56:735-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Comparison of three different multiple organ dysfunction scores for predicting mortality after neonatal cardiac surgery. Children (Basel). 2023;10:1333.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Predictors for mortality after prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery in children. J Crit Care. 2002;17:235-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Acute kidney injury after arterial switch operation: Incidence, risk factors, clinical impact-a retrospective single-center study. Ren Fail. 2023;45:2167661.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Acute kidney injury and short-term renal support in the post-operative management of neonates following repair of transposition of the great arteries. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;52:26-32.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Renal outcomes in neonates and infants with transposition physiology undergoing arterial switch procedure. Pediatr Cardiol. 2022;43:1770-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections